On October 21, the Information and Broadcasting Ministry issued an advisory which said that putting the prime minister’s speeches on national occasions in “artificial competition” with anyone was not appropriate.
On October 21, the Information and Broadcasting Ministry issued an advisory which said that putting the prime minister’s speeches on national occasions in “artificial competition” with anyone was not appropriate.
The advisory said that certain TV channels had attempted to denigrate the office of the prime minister by constantly trying to compare his Independence Day speech with that of other political leaders and said that it was “sensational, against all norms of ethical journalism”.
The advisory said that the prime minister spoke from the ramparts of the Red Fort as the prime minister of the country, and not as the representative of a political party, and reminded the channels that they were bound to follow programme and advertising codes under the Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act 1995.
The advisory asked TV news channels to follow the provisions of the code scrupulously and maintain the solemnity of national occasions while carrying speeches of the prime minister and the president, and cautioned that further violations would attract penal provisions under relevant rules and terms of uplinking and downlinking.
The move has drawn major flak from the opposition. “This is an unconstitutional censorship order prompted by Modi-phobia,” BJP’s leader Jaitley said.
“The effect of this order is that on days the prime minister addresses the nation, no other speech should be telecast. The chief ministers of the states must be boycotted. Any comment of an opposition leader should be censored. If this principle is accepted it may even extend to a finance minister’s budget speech or a defence minister’s comment on security,” he said.
Jaitely, who is Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha, said censorship has no place in a democracy, and cannot be enforced directly or indirectly.
“Comment and criticism is a way of life. Even judgments of the highest court can be criticised. All individuals in public life must be subjected to scrutiny. We must be criticised when we go wrong. Criticism is a part of public accountability,” he said.
“No action under the cable law can be taken, in case of the legitimate exercise of the freedom of speech,” he said, citing Article 19 (2) of the constitution, that provides conditions under which the right to free speech can be restricted.
“If the prime minister speaks for the nation on a national day, so do chief ministers; so does the opposition,” he countered.
The move came exactly at the same time when Congress party was suffering at the hands of Modi due to his continuous PM and government bashing.
It should be noted that Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi had sought to punch holes in Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s Independence Day speech. The speech by Modi, who has been named prime minister candidate of the BJP, also featured on several TV news channels.
Rightnow, Congress is in news for approving Election Commissions idea of banning opinion polls. In the past too, the party had tried to curb free speech by attempting a watch on social media.
As other political parties like AAP had been accusing, Congress, it seems, gives no concern to the fundamental right when it comes to its own safety. But the party should understand that it is their developmental work which would gain them votes.
